I often hear of people finding it perverse that you should give to people so that you yourself feel better. It is often psychiatrists who get caught in that dilemma.
However, perhaps it would help them to dwell on what is said about this in the bible, namely "give, so that God can give to you."
I am sure that approach could help quite a few people.
My husband informed me that the Conservative Party is intending to reduce taxes to the rich. To reduce the risk of this being detrimental to the lower paid and to the poor, perhaps the following could be implemented:
There would be two governing parties, ie the Labour and Conservative Party. This would mean that all levels within the population would be represented. This alone would bring in more balance.
I feel that by reducing the overall tax revenue by 15% and by not going into too much deficit spending, as the latter is unnerving and creates a shaky dependency on the world economy, we could then start certain other factors.
People above a certain income could not use the NHS and they would have to pay for their children's education. They would also have to pay for any university education their children would have. There are other things too that one could add to the list.
In turn some of the revenue would be spent on creating a modest, rewarding and healthy life style for the lower paid and poor.
People who are deprived (by the rich) of their rightful circumstances may not have the financial or socially behavioural wiles to gain their rights, but their negative thoughts resulting from this - thoughts of resentment, envy, depression, hate, or dull resignation, often carry and permeate whole areas. These negative factors are exacerbated by boredom and there is often a spiralling downwards within society as a whole.
There is the same percentage of refined people and intelligent people born to these classes as there are to any other class of society, so let's not waste our Einsteins and Shakespeares in a council hovel just because the rich are greedy and can't set themselves limits.
Many women in the past have been very hurt at baby boys being valued so much more than baby girls. Although this is no longer the case in the West, one still sees it elsewhere in the world. However, understanding it in its historical context is perhaps useful. On many occasions in history there have been more women than men. Life then, of course, was much more physical. The women were unable to fell trees etc to build homes or do many of the hard physical tasks needed for the group's survival. Realising this the men out of compassion, took on more than one wife. We see this in biblical times, in the past with the Mormons and still with present day Muslims.
Now if the wives didn't bear enough sons, there would not be enough men to maintain the group's needs and also there wouldn't be enough men to protect the women. They could all perish. Thus there was relief and joy when a son was born, as it assured the survival of the whole group.
After years and years of such circumstances, it is ingrained in us genetically and will probably take some considerable time before it is eliminated.
With regard to women needing to obey their husbands and so gain their protection, I would add that the husband must have integrity and any instructions must always be realistic.
I feel it would be about right if one quarter of the Earth's land mass would be reforested and would remain so. I feel this could restore and maintain balance ecologically and yet enable successful human survival and activity.
When analysing the rights and wrongs of abortion, there are so many considerations that have to be taken into account.
Firstly, the huge abortion rate coupled with the natural death rate together, add up to almost the birth rate, in this desperately over crowded world.
However, the havoc being wrought by the vengeful spirits of aborted babies is extremely costly and very detrimental to the health, success and happiness of humanity as a whole. This is apart from the sadness and grieving the woman feels.
Couples who abort also tend to live apart afterwards with the woman wanting her independence. This alone brings poverty or financial strain into their lives and often causes a sense of isolation and loneliness and can contribute to any general feeling of unhappiness.
The good side to this is that the couple then don't have children, which again acts against the severe Overpopulation problem we have on the planet.
Anyway, what can one do? I feel that the decision to abort or not should be left up to the woman, and possibly by preventing unwanted pregnancies as much as we can, we can limit situations such as I have described above. It always amazes me how humans never choose the rational way out of a dilemma, but always need some disaster to stop them doing what they are doing. But God said through Kenneth Copeland; 'My people perish through lack of knowledge.' So once again one can see the need for better guidance.
I also don't understand the argument that a woman can do what she likes with her body, as it is not her body, but that of a separate entity. I don't think she should base her decision to abort on that argument.
I feel that the misinterpretation of conditions in their country by people in America could stem from their children reciting the patriotic statement every morning (if they still do?)
Also the repeated showing of films depicting disasters on Grand, Grand scales - such as dramatic fires and other dramas in sky scrapers could be somewhat conducive to events like nine eleven.
With this in mind, and considering the rules of Reality Ordering, perhaps film makers could be careful about their representation of extra-terrestials, especially with regard to their intentions.
I have read that people can pay with a Poem as lyrics are now deemed more powerful than money.
According to Plato, the Gods are mere projections of the poets. If this is the case, then why don't we as individuals create our own God - solely a projection of what comforts us the most and solely for our own use.
For spiritual people this could be the Higher Self and for the more Material Person, a character (type) that they admire or finds comforts them.
Such would at least free us from the crippling demand of the purely conditional love that Jesus offers.
The God we would evolve tailored to our unique individuality could also embody our weaknesses and faults and the very things we castigate about ourselves.
Do we see the source as firms? Yes. Reality is God's firm, film and game - a sort of advanced maths book.
Or is reality just some sadistic joke. I hope not.
Perhaps one way to analyse the problems in humanity today is to analyse the basic characteristics in the four anthropological races, I.e. Mongoloid, Austroloide, Negroide and Caucasian.
It seems to me that Caucasoides have two characteristics relevant to conditions in the world today: one is they adhere to religions which they feel to spread is a life or death matter and another is their approach to progress.
Progress and development is an innate content within at least Western Caucasoide nature.
As characteristics such as the above are linked to the use of language perhaps it would be helpful to analyse such words as Entwicklung, Fortschritt, development and progress in the languages of other anthropological races.
These words have positive associations and create a sensation of relief and positive imaging in western Caucasoides. However, one can imagine that in the Austroloide race and Negroide race their equivalent words must evoke something different.
The Australian Aborigines existed successfully for 60,000 years in balance. One of their basic philosophies was that a thing didn't exist until you name it, so understanding such peoples' association to words like development and also relating such innate words to physical objects can perhaps help understand where we have gone wrong. It could perhaps help in developing at least a secondary language which somehow relates and tolerates everything in some sort of disciplinary fashion.
Such can at least be used in Healing systems. People I have been talking to and who happen to mention their ailment to me have been healed by my telling them to use a certain syllable.
Also furthering the principle of the Aborigines, they have the Dream aspect fundamental to their society, which as mentioned thrived for 60,000 years. Perhaps one has a connection here to my ideas (see blogs) on Reality Frames, semi-fictional reality, and devising and disbanding futures.
Relating or understanding words especially in connection to physical objects helps create a more geometrically related staticity about existence and could help in today's somewhat hectic world.
