I think men could define their role if they stopped seeing women as sex symbols and realise that in some of her reactions these days she is merely misguided.
Men need to protect women, see the woman not as something to be ridiculed for the fact she changes her mind, etc., but they should realise she does so because she is affected by a multitude of things which men are not, i.e. the moon, the earth's magnetism, cosmic influences, hormonal changes which make her unique and which give her the massive power to give birth.
Another thing men should realise is that today women's role of preserving life and morals is being frustrated by the over population factor. Perhaps guided by instinct they are having fewer and fewer children. This leaves their natural creativity abandoned and the only way they seem to be able to react to this is by utterly demeaning their role a nurturer, home centre, carer and love giver. This is causing chaos as each sex is losing its way.
Men should realise what a predicament women are in. Here, I might add, my new economics theory would help (see my blog 'Glynworld'), as there the nurturer caring for the children/child would have access to the goods for her/his self and the children. This would stop one sex dominating over the other and take out the stress.
Freitag, 16. September 2011
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen